NR 439 Week 5: Reading Research Literature (graded)

NR 439 Week 5: Reading Research Literature (graded)

WE WRITE ESSAYS FOR STUDENTS

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Reading Research Literature Guidelines

Purpose

The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO4 and 8)

CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO4 and 8)

Points: This assignment is worth 225 points.

Due Date: Submit the completed Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

Requirements

Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.

Retrieve the following research articles: Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.

Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal Of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1  http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Download the Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your form does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.

Please post questions about this assignment to the Q & A Forum.

Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.

Submit the completed form by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

**Academic Integrity Reminder**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 439 Week 5: Reading Research Literature (graded)

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

Rubric

NR439_Reading_Research_Literature

NR439_Reading_Research_Literature

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVelayutham, et al article: Question 1 Purpose

Identifies the purpose of the research article.

10.0 pts

Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.

9.0 pts

Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article

8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.

4.0 pts

Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any purpose for the research.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 2 Research Question

Identifies the research question implied in the study.

10.0 pts

Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.

9.0 pts

Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.

8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.

4.0 pts

Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any research question.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 3 Research Design

Describes the research design of the study.

10.0 pts

Correctly describes the research design of the study.

9.0 pts

Mostly describes the research design of the study.

8.0 pts

Somewhat describes the research design of the study.

4.0 pts

Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any research design.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 4 Population

Identifies and describes the population.

10.0 pts

Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

9.0 pts

Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.

8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.

4.0 pts

Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any population.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 5 Sample

Was the sample adequate for the research design?

10.0 pts

Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.

9.0 pts

Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.

8.0 pts

Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.

4.0 pts

Misidentifies the sampling approach.

0.0 pts

Doesn’t explain any sampling approach.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 6 Data Collection

Describe the data collection procedure

10.0 pts

Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general.

8.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.

4.0 pts

Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.

0.0 pts

Does not describe any data collection procedures.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 7 Data Analysis

How were the data analyzed

10.0 pts

Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed.

8.0 pts

Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.

4.0 pts

Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.

0.0 pts

Does not describe how data were analyzed.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 8 Limitations

Describes the limitations in the study.

10.0 pts

Correctly describes all of the limitations in the study.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study.

8.0 pts

Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.

4.0 pts

Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.

0.0 pts

Does not describe any limitations for the study.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 9 Conclusions

Describes the authors’ conclusions.

10.0 pts

Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.

8.0 pts

Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.

4.0 pts

Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.

0.0 pts

Does not describe any author conclusions.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 10 Advances Knowledge

How does this advance knowledge in the field.

10.0 pts

Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.

9.0 pts

Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge.

8.0 pts

Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

4.0 pts

Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

0.0 pts

Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePals et al article: Question 11 Purpose

Identifies the purpose of the research article.

10.0 pts

Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.

9.0 pts

Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article

8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.

4.0 pts

Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any purpose for the research.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 12 Research Question

Identifies the research question implied in the study.

10.0 pts

Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.

9.0 pts

Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.

8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.

4.0 pts

Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any research question.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 13 Research Design

Describes the research design of the study.

10.0 pts

Correctly describes the research design of the study.

9.0 pts

Mostly describes the research design of the study.

8.0 pts

Somewhat describes the research design of the study.

4.0 pts

Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any research design.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 14 Population

Identifies and describes the population.

10.0 pts

Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

9.0 pts

Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.

8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.

4.0 pts

Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any population.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 15 Sample

Was the sample adequate for the research design?

10.0 pts

Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.

9.0 pts

Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.

8.0 pts

Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.

4.0 pts

Misidentifies the sampling approach.

0.0 pts

Doesn’t explain any sampling approach.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 16 Data Collection

Describe the data collection procedure.

10.0 pts

Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general.

8.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.

4.0 pts

Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.

0.0 pts

Does not describe any data collection procedures.

10.0 pts

The post NR 439 Week 5: Reading Research Literature (graded) appeared first on Nursing Assignment Crackers.

Welcome to Online Assignment and Essay Writing Agency. Securing higher grades costing your pocket? Order your assignment online at the lowest price now! Our online essay writers are able to provide high-quality assignment writing help within your deadline. With our homework writing website, you can order reaction paper, research proposal, discussion, capstone projects, movie review, presentation, essays, term papers, research papers, annotated bibliography, or another assignment without having to worry about its originality – we offer 100% original content written completely from scratch